How Should the Precautionary Principle Apply to Pregnant Women in Clinical Research?

Indira S.E. van der Zande, Rieke van der Graaf*, Martijin A. Oudijk, Johannes J.M. van Delden

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
93 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The precautionary principle is often invoked in relation to pregnant women and may be one of the underlying reasons for their continuous underrepresentation in clinical research. The principle is appealing, because potential fetal harm as a result of research participation is considered to be serious and irreversible. In our paper, we explore through conceptual analysis whether and if so how the precautionary principle should apply to pregnant women. We argue that the principle is a decision-making strategy underlying risk-benefit decisions in clinical research, which can be applied to pregnant women. However, the current application is a strong one, leading to the promotion of absolute exclusion or, less often, absolute inclusion of pregnant women. In order to change this paralyzing situation, a shift toward weak precautionary thinking is necessary. Instead of automatic extreme precaution, a balance will be found between harms and potential benefits of including pregnant women in clinical research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)516-529
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Medicine and Philosophy
Volume46
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1-Oct-2021

Keywords

  • exclusion
  • precautionary principle
  • pregnant women
  • research ethics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How Should the Precautionary Principle Apply to Pregnant Women in Clinical Research?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this