Human rights and impact assessment: clarifying the connections in practice

D. Kemp, F. Vanclay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

121 Citations (Scopus)
13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Historically, impact assessment practice has not explicitly considered human rights. That human rights are relevant to business has been confirmed through the United Nations Human Rights Council's endorsement of the 'Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights'. Special Representative to the Secretary-General on business and human rights, Professor John Ruggie, advocated awareness of 'rights-holders' and 'duty-bearers' and a shift from third parties "naming and shaming" companies as a way of addressing human rights harms to companies also "knowing and showing" how they are taking responsibility for their human rights impacts and managing their human rights risks. Consideration of human rights should therefore be central to impact assessment for private sector projects, especially those affecting livelihoods, environment, health, safety and security, land and property, culture and gender dynamics. We provide an introduction to the business and human rights debate, discuss the relevance of human rights to the field of impact assessment, and examine a range of challenges associated with integrating the fields of human rights and social impact assessment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)86-96
Number of pages11
JournalImpact Assessment & Project Appraisal
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • CORPORATE
  • DISCOURSE
  • LESSONS
  • SHELL
  • OGONI

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Human rights and impact assessment: clarifying the connections in practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this