Hybrid materialities, power, and expertise in the era of general purpose technologies

Ludovico Rella*, Kristian Bondo Hansen, Nanna Bonde Thylsturp, Malcolm Campbell-Verduyn, Alex Preda, Daivi Rodima-Taylor, Ruowen Xu, Till Straube

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article proposes three distinct perspectives on and approaches to the study of hybridisation across society, industries, and academia enabled by General Purpose Technologies like AI and blockchain. The term hybridisation is frequently invoked to describe and prescribe human-machine interaction and technological interoperability. Critically assessing processes of hybridisation through the perspectives of (1) materiality, (2) power and (3) expertise, we argue that the language of hybridity smoothens out frictions between human judgment, on the one hand, and automated decision-making, on the other, and that processes of hybridisation veil technology-induced epistemic and economic inequalities. In each of these perspectives, we draw on fieldwork conducted at different sites where general-purpose technologies are in play.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)138-157
Number of pages20
JournalDistinktion
Volume26
Issue number1
Early online date22-Oct-2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Keywords

  • Domain expertise
  • general purpose technologies
  • hybridity
  • materialities
  • power

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hybrid materialities, power, and expertise in the era of general purpose technologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this