I Ought to Reply, So I Can

Bart Streumer

doi:10.1007/s11406-018-0042-2

I Ought to Reply, So I Can

Bart Streumer^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Ethics, Social and Political Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

168 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

I have elsewhere given three arguments for the claim that there can be a reason for a person to perform an action only if this person can perform this action. Henne, Semler, Chituc, De Brigard, and Sinnott-Armstrong make several objections to my arguments. I here respond to their objections.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1547-1554
Number of pages	8
Journal	Philosophy
Volume	47
Issue number	5
Early online date	15-Nov-2018
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-018-0042-2
Publication status	Published - 2019

Keywords

EMPIRICAL REFUTATION
IMPLIES
REASONS

Access to Document

10.1007/s11406-018-0042-2Licence: CC BY

I Ought to Reply, So I CanFinal publisher's version, 265 KBLicence: CC BY

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{9a44dc377cba47c5bdc9e95cb28138ea,

title = "I Ought to Reply, So I Can",

abstract = "I have elsewhere given three arguments for the claim that there can be a reason for a person to perform an action only if this person can perform this action. Henne, Semler, Chituc, De Brigard, and Sinnott-Armstrong make several objections to my arguments. I here respond to their objections.",

keywords = "EMPIRICAL REFUTATION, IMPLIES, REASONS",

author = "Bart Streumer",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.1007/s11406-018-0042-2",

language = "English",

volume = "47",

pages = "1547--1554",

journal = "Philosophy",

issn = "0031-8191",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - I Ought to Reply, So I Can

AU - Streumer, Bart

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - I have elsewhere given three arguments for the claim that there can be a reason for a person to perform an action only if this person can perform this action. Henne, Semler, Chituc, De Brigard, and Sinnott-Armstrong make several objections to my arguments. I here respond to their objections.

AB - I have elsewhere given three arguments for the claim that there can be a reason for a person to perform an action only if this person can perform this action. Henne, Semler, Chituc, De Brigard, and Sinnott-Armstrong make several objections to my arguments. I here respond to their objections.

KW - EMPIRICAL REFUTATION

KW - IMPLIES

KW - REASONS

U2 - 10.1007/s11406-018-0042-2

DO - 10.1007/s11406-018-0042-2

M3 - Article

SN - 0031-8191

VL - 47

SP - 1547

EP - 1554

JO - Philosophy

JF - Philosophy

IS - 5

ER -

I Ought to Reply, So I Can

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Handle.net

Fingerprint

Cite this