Illegitimacy and identity threat in (inter)action: Predicting intergroup orientations among minority group members

Andrew G. Livingstone*, Russell Spears, Antony S. R. Manstead, Martin Bruder

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We test the hypothesis that intergroup orientations among minority group members are shaped by the interaction between the perceived illegitimacy of intergroup relations and identity threat appraisals, as well as their main effects. This is because together they serve to focus emotion-mediated reactions on the out-group's role in threatening in-group identity. In a large-scale field study (N = 646), conducted among the Welsh minority in the UK, we quasi-manipulated the extent to which Welsh identity was dependent on the 'threatened' Welsh language. Results supported our hypothesis that the illegitimacy x identity threat interaction would be strongest where Welsh identity was most dependent upon the Welsh language, and through intergroup anger would predict support for more radical, unconstitutional forms of action.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)755-775
Number of pages21
JournalBritish Journal of Social Psychology
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec-2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • SOCIAL IDENTITY
  • COLLECTIVE ACTION
  • RELATIVE DEPRIVATION
  • SUBGROUP RELATIONS
  • ACTION TENDENCIES
  • WELSH IDENTITY
  • DIFFERENTIATION
  • MODEL
  • PSYCHOLOGY
  • STRATEGIES

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Illegitimacy and identity threat in (inter)action: Predicting intergroup orientations among minority group members'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this