Importance of external quality assessment for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection during the COVID-19 pandemic

Oliver Donoso Mantke*, Victor M. Corman, Francesca Taddei, Elaine McCulloch, Daniela Niemeyer, Laura Grumiro, Giorgio Dirani, Paul S. Wallace, Christian Drosten, Vittorio Sambri, Hubert G. M. Niesters

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Antigen testing has become an essential part of fighting the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. With the continual increase in available tests, independent and extensive comparative evaluations using data from external quality assessment (EQA) studies to evaluate test performance between different users are required.Objectives: An EQA scheme was established to assess the sensitivity of antigen tests and the potential impact of circulating SARS-CoV-2 strains on their performance.Study design: Panels were prepared for three challenges in 2021 containing inactivated SARS-CoV-2-positive samples of various genetic strains (including variants of concern, VOCs) at different concentrations, and negative samples. Data was analysed based on qualitative testing results in relation to the antigen test used. Results: Participants registered for each individual challenge in any combination. In total, 258 respondents from 27 countries worldwide were counted submitting 472 datasets. All core samples were correctly reported by 76.7 to 83.1% at participant level and by 73.5 to 83.8% at dataset level. Sensitivity differences could be shown in viral loads and SARS-CoV-2 strains/variants including the impact on performance by a B.1.1.7-like mutant strain with a deletion in the nucleoprotein gene. Lateral flow rapid antigen tests showed a higher rate of false negatives in general compared with automated point-of-care tests and laboratory ELISA/immunoassays.Conclusions: EQA schemes can provide valuable data to inform participants about weaknesses in their testing process or methods and support ongoing assay evaluations for regulatory approval or post-market surveillance.

Original languageEnglish
Article number105222
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Virology
Volume154
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep-2022

Keywords

  • Severe acute respiratory syndrome
  • Antigen test
  • COVID-19 testing
  • Sensitivity
  • SARS-CoV-2 variants
  • Quality assurance

Cite this