Abstract
Criticism may degenerate into quibbling or nitpicking. How can discussants keep quibblers under control? In the paper we investigate cases in which a battle about words replaces a discussion of the matters that are actually at issue as well as cases in which a battle about minor objections replaces a discussion of the major issues. We survey some lines of discussion dealing with these situations in profiles of dialogue.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Argumentation and Inference |
Subtitle of host publication | Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumenation |
Editors | Steve Oswald, Didier Maillat |
Publisher | College Publications |
Chapter | 12 |
Pages | 283-303 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Volume | 1 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-1-84890-283-1 |
Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Event | 2nd European Conference on Argumentation - Fribourg, Switzerland Duration: 20-Jun-2017 → 23-Jun-2017 http://ecargument.org/?page_id=730 |
Publication series
Name | Studies in Logic: Logic and Argumentation |
---|---|
Publisher | College Publications |
Volume | 76 |
Conference
Conference | 2nd European Conference on Argumentation |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | ECA 2017 |
Country/Territory | Switzerland |
City | Fribourg |
Period | 20/06/2017 → 23/06/2017 |
Internet address |
Keywords
- criticism, difference of opinion, Freedom Rule, hairsplitting, nitpicking, objection, profile of dialogue, quibble, talking at cross-purposes