Incentives for smoking cessation during pregnancy: an ethical framework

Leonieke J Breunis*, Jasper V Been, Lieke de Jong-Potjer, Eric A P Steegers, Inez D de Beaufort, Marlou L A de Kroon, Hafez Ismaili M'hamdi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
43 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Smoking during pregnancy increases the risk of morbidity and mortality of the mother and child. The inability of the unborn child to protect itself, raises the social and academic responsibility to protect the child from the harmful effects of smoking. Interventions including rewards ('incentives') for lifestyle changes are an upcoming trend and can encourage women to quit smoking. However, these incentives can, as we will argue, also have negative consequences, for example the restriction of personal autonomy and encouragement of smoking to become eligible for participation. To prevent these negative consequences, we developed an ethical framework that enables to assess and address unwanted consequences of incentive-based interventions whereby moral permissibility can be evaluated.

METHODS: The possible adverse consequences of incentives were identified through an extensive literature search. Subsequently, we developed ethical criteria to identify these consequences based on the biomedical ethical principles of Beauchamp and Childress.

RESULTS: Our framework consists of twelve criteria. These criteria concern (i) effectiveness, (ii) support of a healthy lifestyle, (iii) motivational for the target population, (iv) stimulating unhealthy behaviour, (v) negative attitudes, (vi) personal autonomy, (vii) intrinsic motivation, (viii) privacy, (ix) fairness, (x) allocation of incentives, (xi) cost-effectiveness, and (xii) health inequity. Based on these criteria, the moral permissibility of potential interventions can be evaluated.

CONCLUSION: Incentives for smoking cessation are a response to the responsibility to protect the unborn child. But these interventions might have possible adverse effects. This ethical framework aims to identify and address ethical pitfalls in order to avoid these adverse effects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1553-1559
Number of pages7
JournalNicotine & Tobacco Research
Volume22
Issue number9
Early online date18-Dec-2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep-2020

Cite this