Incidental Findings in Brain MRI Research: What Do We Owe Our Subjects?

Ronald J. H. Borra*, A. Gregory Sorensen

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    22 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Concern regarding incidental findings on brain MRI studies has been increasing with the growing use of MRI as tool for scientific investigation. In this article, the authors provide an overview of possible approaches to address incidental findings. Incidental findings are surprisingly common (5%-20% of all examinations), although the percentage of clinically serious abnormalities is low (0.3%-3.4%). At present, there is no consensus concerning the optimal strategy on how to deal with incidental findings, in particular how to fulfill ethical responsibilities appropriately within the constraints of available resources. There are a variety of responses possible, and currently, reasonable guidelines exist for formulating a plan tailored to the needs of each institution that will meet the reasonable expectations of subjects participating in brain research studies.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)848-852
    Number of pages5
    JournalJournal of the american college of radiology
    Volume8
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec-2011

    Keywords

    • Incidental imaging findings
    • imaging algorithms
    • ethics
    • PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS
    • IMAGING RESEARCH
    • IMAGES

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Incidental Findings in Brain MRI Research: What Do We Owe Our Subjects?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this