Increasing trends in a low 5-min Apgar score among (near) term singletons: a Dutch nationwide cohort study

C. E. Tacke*, W. Onland, P. C.A.M. Bakker, F. Groenendaal, A. N. Rosman, L. Broeders, J. V. Been, T. A.J. Antonius, P. H. Dijk, K. P. Dijkman, F. A.M. van den Dungen, S. Koole, R. F. Kornelisse, F. A.B.A. Schuerman, E. van Westering-Kroon, R. S.G.M. Witlox, G. de Winter, A. C.J. Ravelli

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)
    31 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Objective: To investigate trends in low Apgar scores in (near) term singletons using the Dutch Perinatal Registry. 

    Methods: In a cohort of 1,583,188 singletons liveborn ≥35 weeks of gestation in the period 2010–2019, we studied trends in low 5-min Apgar scores (<7 and <4) using Cochrane Armitage trend tests. 

    Results: The proportion of infants with low Apgar scores <7 and <4 increased significantly between 2010–2019 (1.04–1.42% (p < 0.001), 0.17–0.19% (p = 0.009), respectively). Neonatal mortality remained unchanged. Induction of labour, epidural analgesia and planned caesarean section showed an increasing trend. Instrumental vaginal delivery and emergency caesarean section were performed less frequently over time, but these intervention subgroups showed the highest relative increase in infants with low Apgar scores. 

    Conclusions: In the Netherlands, the risk of a low 5-min Apgar score increased over the last decade. The highest relative increase was observed in subgroups of instrumental vaginal delivery and emergency caesarean section.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)217–223
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal of perinatology
    Volume44
    Early online date18-Oct-2023
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2024

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Increasing trends in a low 5-min Apgar score among (near) term singletons: a Dutch nationwide cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this