Individual differences in receptivity to scientific bullshit

A. Evans, W. Sleegers, Zan Mlakar

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    30 Citations (Scopus)
    378 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Pseudo-profound bullshit receptivity is the tendency to perceive meaning in important-sounding, nonsense statements. To understand how bullshit receptivity differs across domains, we develop a scale to measure scientific bullshit receptivity - the tendency to perceive truthfulness in nonsensical scientific statements. Across three studies (total N = 1,948), scientific bullshit receptivity was positively correlated with pseudo-profound bullshit receptivity. Both types of bullshit receptivity were positively correlated with belief in science, conservative political beliefs, and faith in intuition. However, compared to pseudo-profound bullshit receptivity, scientific bullshit receptivity was more strongly correlated with belief in science, and less strongly correlated with conservative political beliefs and faith in intuition. Finally, scientific literacy moderated the relationship the two types of bullshit receptivity; the correlation between the two types of receptivity was weaker for individuals scoring high in scientific literacy.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)401-412
    Number of pages12
    JournalJudgement and Decision Making
    Volume15
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - May-2020

    Keywords

    • bullshit receptivity
    • belief in science
    • motivated reasoning
    • false beliefs
    • SEDUCTIVE ALLURE
    • PERSONALITY
    • SCIENCE
    • TESTS
    • NEED

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Individual differences in receptivity to scientific bullshit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this