Information as a Condition of Justice in Financial Markets: The Regulation of Credit-Rating Agencies

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter argues for deregulation of the credit-rating market. Credit-rating agencies are supposed to contribute to the informational needs of investors trading bonds. They provide ratings of debt issued by corporations and governments, as well as of structured debt instruments (e.g. mortgage-backed securities). As many academics, regulators, and commentators have pointed out, the ratings of structured instruments turned out to be highly inaccurate, and, as a result, they have argued for tighter regulation of the industry. This chapter shows, however, that the role of credit-rating agencies in achieving justice in finance is not as great as these commentators believe. It therefore argues instead for deregulation. Since the 1930s, lawgivers have unjustifiably elevated the rating agencies into official, legally binding sources of information concerning credit risk, thereby unjustifiably causing many institutional investors to outsource their epistemic responsibilities, that is, their responsibility to investigate credit risk themselves.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationJust Financial Markets? Finance in a Just Society
EditorsLisa Herzog
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages250-270
Number of pages21
ISBN (Electronic)9780191816789
ISBN (Print)9780198755661
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • conflict of interest
  • credit ratings and credit rating agencies
  • epistemology
  • finance
  • information and product quality
  • justice
  • markets
  • regulation
  • securities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Information as a Condition of Justice in Financial Markets: The Regulation of Credit-Rating Agencies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this