Inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonists in asthma - A narrative review

Alberto Papi*, Leonardo M Fabbri, Huib A M Kerstjens, Paola Rogliani, Henrik Watz, Dave Singh

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) have a recognised role in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In asthma, muscarinic antagonists (both short- and long-acting) were historically considered less effective than β2-agonists; only relatively recently have studies been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of LAMAs, as add-on to either inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) monotherapy or ICS/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) combinations. These studies led to the approval of the first LAMA, tiotropium, as an add-on therapy in patients with poorly controlled asthma. Subsequently, a number of single-inhaler ICS/LABA/LAMA triple therapies have been approved or are in clinical development for the management of asthma. There is now substantial evidence of the efficacy and safety of LAMAs in asthma that is uncontrolled despite treatment with an ICS/LABA combination. This regimen is recommended by GINA as an optimisation step for patients with severe asthma before any biologic or systemic corticosteroid treatment is initiated. This narrative review summarises the potential mechanisms of action of LAMAs in asthma, together with the initial clinical evidence supporting this use. We also discuss the studies that led to the approval of tiotropium for asthma and the data evaluating the efficacy and safety of the various triple therapies, before considering other potential uses for triple therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)14-22
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Internal Medicine
Volume85
Early online date6-Feb-2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar-2021

Cite this