Integrated Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessments Late After Fontan Operation

Sophie L. Meyer, Nicole St Clair, Andrew J. Powell, Tal Geva, Rahul H. Rathod*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    14 Citations (Scopus)
    52 Downloads (Pure)


    BACKGROUND Several clinical and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived parameters have been shown to be associated with death or heart transplant late after the Fontan operation.

    OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to identify the relative importance and interactions of clinical and CMR-based parameters for risk stratification after the Fontan operation.

    METHODS Fontan patients were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and CMR parameters were analyzed using univariable Cox regression. The primary endpoint was time to death or (listing for) heart transplant. To identify the patients at highest risk for the endpoint, classification and regression tree survival analysis was performed, including all significant variables from Cox regression.

    RESULTS The cohort consisted of 416 patients (62% male) with a median age of 16 years (25th, 75th percentiles: 11, 23 years). Over a median follow-up of 5.4 years (25th, 75th percentiles: 2.4, 10.0 years) after CMR, 57 patients (14%) reached the endpoint (46 deaths, 7 heart transplants, 4 heart transplant listings). Lower total indexed end-diastolic volume (EDVi) was the strongest predictor of transplant-free survival. Among patients with dilated ventricles (EDVi >= 156 ml/BSA(1.3)), worse global circumferential strain (GCS) was the next most important predictor (73% vs. 44%). In patients with smaller ventricles (EDVi = II was the next most important predictor (30% vs. 4%).

    CONCLUSIONS In this cohort of patients late after Fontan operation, increased ventricular dilation was the strongest independent predictor of death or transplant (listing). Patients with both ventricular dilation and worse GCS were at highest risk. These data highlight the value of integrating CMR and clinical parameters for risk stratification in this population. (C) 2021 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2480-2489
    Number of pages10
    JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
    Issue number20
    Publication statusPublished - 25-May-2021


    • CART analysis
    • CMR
    • Fontan circulation
    • strain

    Cite this