Integration and focus from the perspective of social impact assessment: A response to Morrison-Saunders et al.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The paper by Morrison-Saunders et al. [Morrison-Saunders A, Pope J, Gunn J, Bond A, Retief F. 2014. Strengthening impact assessment: a call for integration and focus. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 32(1):2–8] was interesting reading, but ultimately unconvincing in that it did not adequately prove its point. There were too many assertions. The issues of integration and focus are more complex than they suggest. A more considered analysis would have led to a different
outcome. Coming from a social impact assessment perspective, I consider Morrison-Saunders et al. to be guilty of the same thing they complain about, i.e. silo-based expertise, given their lack of connection to papers and discussions outside of their fields of environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-13
Number of pages3
JournalImpact Assessment & Project Appraisal
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar-2014

Keywords

  • Interdisciplinarity
  • National Environmental Policy Act
  • Nation Building Economic Stimulus Plan
  • comprehensive assessment
  • environmental, social, and health impact assessment
  • greentape cutting
  • PRINCIPLES
  • MANAGEMENT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Integration and focus from the perspective of social impact assessment: A response to Morrison-Saunders et al.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this