Integration as unrealised ideal of ERP systems: An exploration of complexity resulting from multiple variations of integration

Henk-Jan van Roekel, Martijn van der Steen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to uncover how implementation practices affect the unfolding of integration as the ideal of an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. In this way, the authors aim to provide a better understanding of the ways in which the ideal of integration affects the complexity of ERP systems.

Design/methodology/approach This paper interprets a case study of the implementation of an ERP system in a Dutch company.

Findings The paper highlights how different variations of an object of integration were enacted during an ERP implementation. The authors observe how the interests of the various actors were not always served by the variations of integration in circulation. They illustrate how this resulted in a failure of the network to be folded into a taken-for-granted configuration of constituent parts. Consequentially, having multiple variations of integration contributed to increased complexity of the system.

Originality/value The paper highlights how multiple variations of a single object of integration are brought into circulation. Such perspective enables a better understanding of some of the complexities associated with ERP implementations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2-34
Number of pages33
JournalQualitative Research in Accounting & Management
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • ERP systems
  • Integration
  • Objects
  • RESOURCE PLANNING SYSTEMS
  • ACTOR-NETWORK THEORY
  • MANAGEMENT CONTROL
  • ACCOUNTING PRACTICES
  • BOUNDARY OBJECTS
  • IMPLEMENTATION
  • ENTERPRISE
  • SUCCESS
  • FAILURE
  • LOGICS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Integration as unrealised ideal of ERP systems: An exploration of complexity resulting from multiple variations of integration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this