Intentionality, pointing, and early symbolic cognition

Corijn van Mazijk*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
49 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Concepts such as “symbolism” and “symbolic cognition” often remain unspecified in discussions the symbolic capacities of earlier hominins. In this paper, I use conceptual tools from phenomenology to reflect on the origins of early symbolic cognition. In particular, I discuss the possible early use of pointing gestures around the time of the earliest known stone tool industries. I argue that unlike more basic social acts such as expression, gaze following, and attention-getters, which are used by extant non-human great apes, communicative pointing involves key elements that are characteristic of symbolic cognition. In particular, it involves “third order intentionality” as well as “shared practice horizons”: shared frameworks of understanding which are required for the interpretation of communicative acts whose meaning is not codified indexically or iconically in the signaling behavior. In the final part, I briefly review some indications for the use of pointing gestures around the time of the Lomekwian and Oldowan industries, as a way to sustain cooperation and possibly learning by instruction. It is suggested that pointing is more complex than is standardly acknowledged, and that it may have been an important communicative act for Early Stone Age hominins in transitioning to more fully symbolic speech capacities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)439-458
Number of pages20
JournalHuman Studies
Volume47
Issue number3
Early online date25-Mar-2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept-2024

Keywords

  • Cognitive archaeology
  • Hominins
  • Intentionality
  • Phenomenology
  • Symbolism
  • Theory of mind

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intentionality, pointing, and early symbolic cognition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this