Interrater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module I: Level of Personality Functioning Scale

Tore Buer Christensen; Muirne C. S. Paap; Marianne Arnesen; Karoline Koritzinsky; Tor-Erik Nysaeter; Ingeborg Eikenaes; Sara Germans Selvik; Kristoffer Walther; Svenn Torgersen; Donna S. Bender; Andrew E. Skodol; Elfrida Kvarstein; Geir Pedersen; Benjamin Hummelen

doi:10.1080/00223891.2018.1483377

Interrater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module I: Level of Personality Functioning Scale

Tore Buer Christensen, Muirne C. S. Paap, Marianne Arnesen, Karoline Koritzinsky, Tor-Erik Nysaeter, Ingeborg Eikenaes, Sara Germans Selvik, Kristoffer Walther, Svenn Torgersen, Donna S. Bender, Andrew E. Skodol, Elfrida Kvarstein, Geir Pedersen, Benjamin Hummelen

Developmental and behavioural disorders in education and care: assessment and intervention

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

45 Citations (Scopus)

1498 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) presents an alternative model for personality disorders in which severity of personality pathology is evaluated by the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS). The Structured Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders, Module I (SCID-5-AMPD I) is a new tool for LPFS assessment, but its interrater reliability (IRR) has not yet been tested. Here we examined the reliability of the Norwegian translation of the SCID-5-AMPD I, applying two different designs: IRR assessment based on ratings of 17 video-recorded SCID-5-AMPD I interviews by five raters; and test-retest IRR based on interviews of 33 patients administered by two different raters within a short interval. For the video-based investigation, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values ranged from .77 to .94 for subdomains, .89 to .95 for domains, and .96 for total LPFS. For the test-retest investigation, ICC ranged from .24 to .72 for subdomains, .59 to .90 for domains, and .75 for total LPFS. The test-retest study revealed questionable reliability estimates for some subdomains. However, overall the level of personality functioning was measured with a sufficient degree of IRR when assessed by the SCID-5-AMPD I.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	630-641
Number of pages	12
Journal	Journal of Personality Assessment
Volume	100
Issue number	6
Early online date	7-Aug-2018
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1483377
Publication status	Published - 2-Nov-2018

Keywords

personality disorder
UNITED-STATES
SELF-REPORT
PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION
EMPIRICAL SUPPORT
FIELD TRIALS
IRONIC FATE
PART I
PREVALENCE
CLASSIFICATION
SEVERITY

Access to Document

10.1080/00223891.2018.1483377

Interrater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM–5 Alternative ModelFinal publisher's version, 1.18 MBLicence: Taverne

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

Buer Christensen, T., Paap, M. C. S., Arnesen, M., Koritzinsky, K., Nysaeter, T.-E., Eikenaes, I., Germans Selvik, S., Walther, K., Torgersen, S., Bender, D. S., Skodol, A. E., Kvarstein, E., Pedersen, G., & Hummelen, B. (2018). Interrater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module I: Level of Personality Functioning Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(6), 630-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1483377

@article{daba9b65dc944adf932dac1f2423fa10,

title = "Interrater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module I: Level of Personality Functioning Scale",

abstract = "The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) presents an alternative model for personality disorders in which severity of personality pathology is evaluated by the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS). The Structured Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders, Module I (SCID-5-AMPD I) is a new tool for LPFS assessment, but its interrater reliability (IRR) has not yet been tested. Here we examined the reliability of the Norwegian translation of the SCID-5-AMPD I, applying two different designs: IRR assessment based on ratings of 17 video-recorded SCID-5-AMPD I interviews by five raters; and test-retest IRR based on interviews of 33 patients administered by two different raters within a short interval. For the video-based investigation, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values ranged from .77 to .94 for subdomains, .89 to .95 for domains, and .96 for total LPFS. For the test-retest investigation, ICC ranged from .24 to .72 for subdomains, .59 to .90 for domains, and .75 for total LPFS. The test-retest study revealed questionable reliability estimates for some subdomains. However, overall the level of personality functioning was measured with a sufficient degree of IRR when assessed by the SCID-5-AMPD I.",

keywords = "personality disorder, UNITED-STATES, SELF-REPORT, PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION, EMPIRICAL SUPPORT, FIELD TRIALS, IRONIC FATE, PART I, PREVALENCE, CLASSIFICATION, SEVERITY",

author = "{Buer Christensen}, Tore and Paap, {Muirne C. S.} and Marianne Arnesen and Karoline Koritzinsky and Tor-Erik Nysaeter and Ingeborg Eikenaes and {Germans Selvik}, Sara and Kristoffer Walther and Svenn Torgersen and Bender, {Donna S.} and Skodol, {Andrew E.} and Elfrida Kvarstein and Geir Pedersen and Benjamin Hummelen",

year = "2018",

month = nov,

day = "2",

doi = "10.1080/00223891.2018.1483377",

language = "English",

volume = "100",

pages = "630--641",

journal = "Journal of Personality Assessment",

issn = "0022-3891",

publisher = "Taylor & Francis Group",

number = "6",

}

Buer Christensen, T, Paap, MCS, Arnesen, M, Koritzinsky, K, Nysaeter, T-E, Eikenaes, I, Germans Selvik, S, Walther, K, Torgersen, S, Bender, DS, Skodol, AE, Kvarstein, E, Pedersen, G & Hummelen, B 2018, 'Interrater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module I: Level of Personality Functioning Scale', Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 630-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1483377

Interrater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module I: Level of Personality Functioning Scale. / Buer Christensen, Tore; Paap, Muirne C. S.; Arnesen, Marianne et al.
In: Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 100, No. 6, 02.11.2018, p. 630-641.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interrater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module I

T2 - Level of Personality Functioning Scale

AU - Buer Christensen, Tore

AU - Paap, Muirne C. S.

AU - Arnesen, Marianne

AU - Koritzinsky, Karoline

AU - Nysaeter, Tor-Erik

AU - Eikenaes, Ingeborg

AU - Germans Selvik, Sara

AU - Walther, Kristoffer

AU - Torgersen, Svenn

AU - Bender, Donna S.

AU - Skodol, Andrew E.

AU - Kvarstein, Elfrida

AU - Pedersen, Geir

AU - Hummelen, Benjamin

PY - 2018/11/2

Y1 - 2018/11/2

N2 - The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) presents an alternative model for personality disorders in which severity of personality pathology is evaluated by the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS). The Structured Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders, Module I (SCID-5-AMPD I) is a new tool for LPFS assessment, but its interrater reliability (IRR) has not yet been tested. Here we examined the reliability of the Norwegian translation of the SCID-5-AMPD I, applying two different designs: IRR assessment based on ratings of 17 video-recorded SCID-5-AMPD I interviews by five raters; and test-retest IRR based on interviews of 33 patients administered by two different raters within a short interval. For the video-based investigation, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values ranged from .77 to .94 for subdomains, .89 to .95 for domains, and .96 for total LPFS. For the test-retest investigation, ICC ranged from .24 to .72 for subdomains, .59 to .90 for domains, and .75 for total LPFS. The test-retest study revealed questionable reliability estimates for some subdomains. However, overall the level of personality functioning was measured with a sufficient degree of IRR when assessed by the SCID-5-AMPD I.

AB - The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) presents an alternative model for personality disorders in which severity of personality pathology is evaluated by the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS). The Structured Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders, Module I (SCID-5-AMPD I) is a new tool for LPFS assessment, but its interrater reliability (IRR) has not yet been tested. Here we examined the reliability of the Norwegian translation of the SCID-5-AMPD I, applying two different designs: IRR assessment based on ratings of 17 video-recorded SCID-5-AMPD I interviews by five raters; and test-retest IRR based on interviews of 33 patients administered by two different raters within a short interval. For the video-based investigation, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values ranged from .77 to .94 for subdomains, .89 to .95 for domains, and .96 for total LPFS. For the test-retest investigation, ICC ranged from .24 to .72 for subdomains, .59 to .90 for domains, and .75 for total LPFS. The test-retest study revealed questionable reliability estimates for some subdomains. However, overall the level of personality functioning was measured with a sufficient degree of IRR when assessed by the SCID-5-AMPD I.

KW - personality disorder

KW - UNITED-STATES

KW - SELF-REPORT

KW - PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION

KW - EMPIRICAL SUPPORT

KW - FIELD TRIALS

KW - IRONIC FATE

KW - PART I

KW - PREVALENCE

KW - CLASSIFICATION

KW - SEVERITY

U2 - 10.1080/00223891.2018.1483377

DO - 10.1080/00223891.2018.1483377

M3 - Article

C2 - 30084661

SN - 0022-3891

VL - 100

SP - 630

EP - 641

JO - Journal of Personality Assessment

JF - Journal of Personality Assessment

IS - 6

ER -

Interrater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module I: Level of Personality Functioning Scale

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Handle.net

Fingerprint

Cite this