Investigating the impact of supervoxel segmentation for unsupervised abnormal brain asymmetry detection

Samuel B. Martins*, Alexandru C. Telea, Alexandre X. Falcão

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
95 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Several brain disorders are associated with abnormal brain asymmetries (asymmetric anomalies). Several computer-based methods aim to detect such anomalies automatically. Recent advances in this area use automatic unsupervised techniques that extract pairs of symmetric supervoxels in the hemispheres, model normal brain asymmetries for each pair from healthy subjects, and treat outliers as anomalies. Yet, there is no deep understanding of the impact of the supervoxel segmentation quality for abnormal asymmetry detection, especially for small anomalies, nor of the added value of using a specialized model for each supervoxel pair instead of a single global appearance model. We aim to answer these questions by a detailed evaluation of different scenarios for supervoxel segmentation and classification for detecting abnormal brain asymmetries. Experimental results on 3D MR-T1 brain images of stroke patients confirm the importance of high-quality supervoxels fit anomalies and the use of a specific classifier for each supervoxel. Next, we present a refinement of the detection method that reduces the number of false-positive supervoxels, thereby making the detection method easier to use for visual inspection and analysis of the found anomalies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101770
JournalComputerized medical imaging and graphics
Volume85
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct-2020

Keywords

  • Abnormal brain asymmetry
  • Anomaly detection
  • MR images of the brain
  • One-class classification
  • Supervoxel segmentation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Investigating the impact of supervoxel segmentation for unsupervised abnormal brain asymmetry detection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this