Is TL-99 a selective presynaptic dopamine receptor agonist?

Alan S. Horn*, Jan de Vries, Durk Dijkstra, Arie H. Mulder

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    46 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The claim that the 2-aminotetralin analogue TL-99 is a selective presynaptic dopamine (DA) receptor agonist has been investigated both in vivo and in vitro in the rat. The pharmacological specificity of the hypomotility caused by TL-99 has been examined using various selective antagonists. In addition its effects on DA metabolism and noradrenaline (NA) and DA turnover (α-MT method) as well as its distribution in the brain have been studied. These in vivo studies provide evidence that although TL-99 is able to activate presynaptic DA receptors it is also a potent agonist of NA receptors as shown by the fact that the hypomotility could be partly reversed by the selective α2-adrenoceptor antagonists yohimbine and piperoxan. Further supporting evidence for these findings was provided by in vitro studies on the inhibition of K+-induced [3H]dopamine, [14C]acetylcholine and [3H]noradrenaline release from striatal and cortical slices where it was shown that TL-99 is not only active at both pre- and postsynaptic DA receptors but also at α2-NA receptors. For the latter receptor it had a potency comparable to that of the potent α2-agonist clonidine and this may explain, to some extent, the hypomotility caused by TL-99. Thus, ascribing this hypomotility solely to an interaction with presynaptic DA receptors may be an oversimplication. It is therefore concluded that TL-99 should not be considered as a selective presynaptic DA receptor agonist.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)35-45
    Number of pages11
    JournalEuropean Journal of Pharmacology
    Volume83
    Issue number1-2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1982

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Is TL-99 a selective presynaptic dopamine receptor agonist?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this