Laboratory Intercomparison of Pleistocene Bone Radiocarbon Dating Protocols

Matthias Huels, Johannes van der Plicht, Fiona Brock, Simon Matzerath, David Chivall

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)
120 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Since its invention in the late 1940s, radiocarbon (14C) dating has become an important tool for absolute dating. A prerequisite for the acceptance of this method is consistency between, and compatibility of, 14C dates from different laboratories. To meet these requirements, international laboratory intercomparison studies with different sample materials are frequently performed (e.g. TIRI, FIRI, VIRI and, most recently, SIRI).Intercomparison is especially relevant and difficult for samples close to the dating limit of ~50 kBP, not least for bone samples. A 14C intercomparison study between the Leibniz-Laboratory in Kiel (Germany), the Center for Isotope Research (CIO) in Groningen (the Netherlands), and the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU, United Kingdom) was performed on three Pleistocene (MIS3) mammal bone samples from the Brick Quarry site Coenen (BQC) in Germany. The comparison of individually prepared and measured bone collagen 14C activities, results from shared collagen measurements, and respective background signatures and correction points to the latter as the main factor responsible for observed differences in final given radiocarbon estimates.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication8th International Symposium Edinburgh
Pages1543-1552
Number of pages10
Volume59
Edition5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct-2017
Event8th International Symposium - Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Duration: 27-Jun-20161-Jul-2016

Conference

Conference8th International Symposium
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityEdinburgh
Period27/06/201601/07/2016

Keywords

  • Pleistocene bone radiocarbon dating
  • laboratory intercomparison
  • background correction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Laboratory Intercomparison of Pleistocene Bone Radiocarbon Dating Protocols'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this