Life Courses in the Globalization Process: The Development of Social Inequalities in Modern Societies

Sandra Buchholz*, Dirk Hofaecker, Melinda Mills, Hans-Peter Blossfeld, Karin Kurz, Heather Hofmeister, D. Hofäcker

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

171 Citations (Scopus)
676 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article examines the impact of the globalization process on individual life courses and employment careers in modern societies from an international comparative perspective. Empirical results are summarized from the GLOBALIFE research project (Life Courses in the Globalization Process), which studied the effects of globalization on life courses for the first time. As the results demonstrate, the globalization process has had diverse effects on different phases of the life course. Qualified men in their mid-careers are broadly protected from the effects of globalization, while young adults are the losers of the globalization process. We also find that educational and class characteristics determine the extent to which an individual faces increasing labour market risks. Under globalization, these effects have intensified. The results of the GLOBALIFE project thus indicate that globalization triggers a strengthening of existing social inequality structures. Another central finding is that globalization has not led to the same outcome across various modern societies. Globalization appears to be distinctly filtered by deeply embedded national institutions. These institutional packages entail diverse strategies of labour market flexibilization which themselves differentially shape patterns of social inequality in modern societies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-71
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Sociological Review
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb-2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Life Courses in the Globalization Process: The Development of Social Inequalities in Modern Societies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this