“Like Upgrading From a Typewriter to a Computer”: Registered Reports in Education Research

Justin Reich, Hunter Gehlbach, Casper J. Albers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)
157 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Registered reports engender a review process in which reviewers evaluate the merits of the research question rather than the magnitude or direction of the results. In this process, authors first submit introduction, methods, and prespecified analyses sections of an article. Next, an initial peer-review process assesses the merits of the research question, in the absence of knowing the results. Worthy articles are granted an ?in-principle acceptance.? The authors, then conduct their study, analyze their data, write up the remainder of their article, and resubmit it. The in-principle acceptance means that if the authors adhere to the research design as originally submitted, then the article will be accepted. Building from seven of the earliest registered reports in education research, our introduction describes the benefits, opportunities, and challenges of registered reports as a means to increasing transparency in research and reducing the number of illusory results.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2332858420917640
Number of pages6
JournalAERA Open
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1-Apr-2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Like Upgrading From a Typewriter to a Computer”: Registered Reports in Education Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this