Load-Oriented Order Release (LOOR) revisited: bringing it back to the state of the art

Haoyun Yan, Mark Stevenson, Linda C. Hendry, Martin J. Land

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)
149 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In the workload control literature, the Load-Oriented Order Release (LOOR) approach has been neglected since its robustness was questioned at the end of the 1990s. This paper revisits LOOR and evaluates whether its performance can be improved in two ways. First, an intermediate pull release mechanism is added to avoid starvation between periodic release events. This mechanism was recently shown to be effective at improving the performance of a state-of-the-art release method known as LUMS COR. Second, an integer linear programming model is used to manage the trade-off between the timing and load balancing functions of order release. The two refinements are assessed using simulations of different shop configurations, which allow us to evaluate robustness. Results demonstrate that the refinements contribute to improving the performance of LOOR such that it can even outperform LUMS COR. Perhaps counter-intuitively, putting more emphasis on load balancing than on the urgency of individual orders is shown to lead to a lower percentage of tardy orders. Overall, the improvements mean that concerns about LOOR’s robustness are no longer valid – it now appears suitable for a wide range of shops found in practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1078-1091
Number of pages14
JournalProduction Planning & Control
Volume27
Issue number13
Early online date13-May-2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Load-Oriented Order Release (LOOR) revisited: bringing it back to the state of the art'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this