Abstract
Assessing environmental changes in Southern Ocean ecosystems is difficult due to its remoteness and data sparsity. Monitoring marine predators that respond rapidly to environmental variation may enable us to track anthropogenic effects on ecosystems. Yet, many long-term datasets of marine predators are incomplete because they are spatially constrained and/or track ecosystems already modified by industrial fishing and whaling in the latter half of the 20th century. Here, we assess the contemporary offshore distribution of a wide-ranging marine predator, the southern right whale (SRW, Eubalaena australis), that forages on copepods and krill from ~30°S to the Antarctic ice edge (>60°S). We analyzed carbon and nitrogen isotope values of 1,002 skin samples from six genetically distinct SRW populations using a customized assignment approach that accounts for temporal and spatial variation in the Southern Ocean phytoplankton isoscape. Over the past three decades, SRWs increased their use of mid-latitude foraging grounds in the south Atlantic and southwest (SW) Indian oceans in the late austral summer and autumn and slightly increased their use of high-latitude (>60°S) foraging grounds in the SW Pacific, coincident with observed changes in prey distribution and abundance on a circumpolar scale. Comparing foraging assignments with whaling records since the 18th century showed remarkable stability in use of mid-latitude foraging areas. We attribute this consistency across four centuries to the physical stability of ocean fronts and resulting productivity in mid-latitude ecosystems of the Southern Ocean compared with polar regions that may be more influenced by recent climate change.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e2214035120 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America |
Volume | 120 |
Issue number | 10 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 7-Mar-2023 |
Access to Document
- 10.1073/pnas.2214035120Licence: CC BY-NC-ND
- Long-term stability in the circumpolar foraging range of a Southern Ocean predator between the eras of whaling and rapid climate changeFinal publisher's version, 2.97 MBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND
Handle.net
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Long-term stability in the circumpolar foraging range of a Southern Ocean predator between the eras of whaling and rapid climate change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 120, No. 10, e2214035120, 07.03.2023.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term stability in the circumpolar foraging range of a Southern Ocean predator between the eras of whaling and rapid climate change
AU - Derville, Solène
AU - Torres, Leigh G.
AU - Newsome, Seth D.
AU - Somes, Christopher J.
AU - Valenzuela, Luciano O.
AU - Vander Zanden, Hannah B.
AU - Baker, C. Scott
AU - Bérubé, Martine
AU - Busquets-Vass, Geraldine
AU - Carlyon, Kris
AU - Childerhouse, Simon J.
AU - Constantine, Rochelle
AU - Dunshea, Glenn
AU - Flores, Paulo A.C.
AU - Goldsworthy, Simon D.
AU - Graham, Brittany
AU - Groch, Karina
AU - Gröcke, Darren R.
AU - Harcourt, Robert
AU - Hindell, Mark A.
AU - Hulva, Pavel
AU - Jackson, Jennifer A.
AU - Kennedy, Amy S.
AU - Lundquist, David
AU - Mackay, Alice I.
AU - Neveceralova, Petra
AU - Oliveira, Larissa
AU - Ott, Paulo H.
AU - Palsbøll, Per J.
AU - Patenaude, Nathalie J.
AU - Rowntree, Victoria
AU - Sironi, Mariano
AU - Vermeuelen, Els
AU - Watson, Mandy
AU - Zerbini, Alexandre N.
AU - Carroll, Emma L.
N1 - Funding Information: Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs, DOC, South Pacific Whale Research Consortium, National Geographic, and Brian Skerry Photography; 2020 Auckland Islands field work—Royal Society Te Apārangi Rutherford Discovery Fellowship to E.L.C., Live Ocean, Lou and Iris Fisher Charitable Trust, and the University of Auckland—Waipapa Taumata Rau (2020 field season); and mainland samples—DOC. Analysis of New Zealand and Australian samples was funded by the AMMC, a Newton Fellowship from the Royal Society of London, Marie Curie Fellowship, and the University of Auckland. We thank the Instituto de Conservación de Ballenas for samples from Argentina. Data from satellite tags deployed in Argentina were provided by the project Siguiendoballenas.org. Tag deployment was conducted under permits issued by Dirección de Fauna y Flora Silvestres and Subsecretaría de Conservación y Areas Protegidas, Province of Chubut, and by Secretaria de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable, Province of Rio Negro. Funding for satellite tracking in Argentina was provided by Instituto Aqualie (Brazil), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of the United States, the International Whaling Commission (IWC), and Wildlife Conservation Society. Data from satellite tags deployed in South Georgia were provided by J.A.J. Tag deployment was conducted under permit RAP/2019/031 issued by the Government of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands (Islas Georgias del Sur y Islas Sandwich del Sur) following review and approval by the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) Animal Welfare and Ethics Review Board (review #1040). Satellite tracking in South Georgia was funded by the Darwin Plus initiative (DPLUS057), with additional funding support from the South Georgia Heritage Trust, Friends of South Georgia Island, World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) UK, and EU BEST 2.0 Medium Grant 1594. The Brazilian samples were collected by Grupo de Estudos de Mamíferos Aquáticos do Rio Grande do Sul (GEMARS) in collaboration with the Projeto Baleia Franca. Isoscape analysis was funded by an International Whaling Commission— Southern Ocean Research Partnership grant. C.J.S. was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (project no. 445549720). P.H.O. was supported by the Brazilian National Research Council (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico—CNPq numbers 477611/2004-4 and 144064/98-7) and World Wildlife Fund (WWF-Brazil). L.O. was supported by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) that provided the research productivity grant nos. 303813/2011-3, 308650/2014-0, 310621/2017-8, and 315361/2021-2. Thanks to all of our colleagues who have worked on these research projects, to Devi Veytia for advice in manuscript preparation, and to Elanor Bell from the IWC-Southern Ocean Research Partnership (SORP) for supporting the work. Funding Information: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. Samples were collected in South Africa as follows: under the South African Department of Environmental Affairs research permit (RES2019/19), the CapeNature sample collection permit (CN44-28-5255), and ethical clearance from the University of Pretoria Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences Ethics Committee (NAS271/2019) for the 2018 to 2019 samples; under permits issued to Peter Best in terms of the South African Sea Fishery Act (no. 12 of 1988) issued 22 February 1995, 9 February 1996, and 9 July 1997 for the 1995 to 1997 samples; and research permits RES2016/99 and RES2017/89 under the Charles University Ethical Committee approval for the 2015 to 2016 samples. Samples were collected in Australia under permits from the Department of Environment (Australia), Department of Environment and Heritage (South Africa), Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water, and Environment (Tasmania), Department of Natural Resources and Environment (Victoria), Office of Environment and Heritage (New South Wales), Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (Queensland) sighting ID 49787, Department of Conservation and Land Management (Western Australia), and Macquarie University Animal Ethics Committee. New Zealand samples were collected under the New Zealand Department of Conservation—Te Papa Atawhai (DOC) Marine Mammal Research permit to CSB (no number) and permit 84845-MAR to E.L.C. and University of Auckland Animal Ethics Committee (AEC) approved protocols AEC/02/2005/R334 to C.S.B. and 002072 to E.L.C. Argentina samples were collected under permits from Dirección de Fauna y Flora Silvestres and Subsecretaría de Conservación y Areas Protegidas from Chubut for Argentina and the University of Utah Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee (IACUC) under assigned protocol number 05-01003 and in Brazil under permit Sisbio 16769 from the Brazilian Ministry of the Environment. Sample collection and analysis were funded by the Charles University Grant Agency (1140217), Dyer Island Conservation Trust, Great White House, Kleinbaai, ExxonMobil, Total, and Eni in South Africa; the Department of Environment, Land, Water, and Planning, Victoria; Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Tasmania; and the Australian Marine Mammal Centre (AMMC), Australia. Sample collection in New Zealand was funded by the following: 1995 to 1998 Auckland Islands field seasons—the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society, the US Department of State (Program for Cooperative US/NZ Antarctic Research), the Auckland University Research Council, and the NZ Marsden Fund; 2006 to 2009 Auckland Islands field seasons—Winifred Violet Scott Estate Research Grant Fund, Australian Antarctic Division, Marine Conservation Action Fund, Blue Planet Marine NZ Ltd., Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment, New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs, DOC, South Pacific Whale Research Consortium, National Geographic, and Brian Skerry Photography; 2020 Auckland Islands field work—Royal Society Te Apārangi Rutherford Discovery Fellowship to E.L.C., Live Ocean, Lou and Iris Fisher Charitable Trust, and the University of Auckland—Waipapa Taumata Rau (2020 field season); and mainland samples—DOC. Analysis of New Zealand and Australian samples was funded by the AMMC, a Newton Fellowship from the Royal Society of London, Marie Curie Fellowship, and the University of Auckland. We thank the Instituto de Conservación de Ballenas for samples from Argentina. Data from satellite tags deployed in Argentina were provided by the project Siguiendoballenas.org. Tag deployment was conducted under permits issued by Dirección de Fauna y Flora Silvestres and Subsecretaría de Conservación y Areas Protegidas, Province of Chubut, and by Secretaria de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable, Province of Rio Negro. Funding for satellite tracking in Argentina was provided by Instituto Aqualie (Brazil), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of the United States, the International Whaling Commission (IWC), and Wildlife Conservation Society. Data from satellite tags deployed in South Georgia were provided by J.A.J. Tag deployment was conducted under permit RAP/2019/031 issued by the Government of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands (Islas Georgias del Sur y Islas Sandwich del Sur) following review and approval by the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) Animal Welfare and Ethics Review Board (review #1040). Satellite tracking in South Georgia was funded by the Darwin Plus initiative (DPLUS057), with additional funding support from the South Georgia Heritage Trust, Friends of South Georgia Island, World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) UK, and EU BEST 2.0 Medium Grant 1594. The Brazilian samples were collected by Grupo de Estudos de Mamíferos Aquáticos do Rio Grande do Sul (GEMARS) in collaboration with the Projeto Baleia Franca. Isoscape analysis was funded by an International Whaling Commission—Southern Ocean Research Partnership grant. C.J.S. was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (project no. 445549720). P.H.O. was supported by the Brazilian National Research Council (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico—CNPq numbers 477611/2004-4 and 144064/98-7) and World Wildlife Fund (WWF-Brazil). L.O. was supported by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) that provided the research productivity grant nos. 303813/2011-3, 308650/2014-0, 310621/2017-8, and 315361/2021-2. Thanks to all of our colleagues who have worked on these research projects, to Devi Veytia for advice in manuscript preparation, and to Elanor Bell from the IWC-Southern Ocean Research Partnership (SORP) for supporting the work. Funding Information: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. Samples were collected in South Africa as follows: under the South African Department of Environmental Affairs research permit (RES2019/19), the CapeNature sample collection permit (CN44-28-5255), and ethical clearance from the University of Pretoria Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences Ethics Committee (NAS271/2019) for the 2018 to 2019 samples; under permits issued to Peter Best in terms of the South African Sea Fishery Act (no. 12 of 1988) issued 22 February 1995, 9 February 1996, and 9 July 1997 for the 1995 to 1997 samples; and research permits RES2016/99 and RES2017/89 under the Charles University Ethical Committee approval for the 2015 to 2016 samples. Samples were collected in Australia under permits from the Department of Environment (Australia), Department of Environment and Heritage (South Africa), Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water, and Environment (Tasmania), Department of Natural Resources and Environment (Victoria), Office of Environment and Heritage (New South Wales), Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (Queensland) sighting ID 49787, Department of Conservation and Land Management (Western Australia), and Macquarie University Animal Ethics Committee. New Zealand samples were collected under the New Zealand Department of Conservation—Te Papa Atawhai (DOC) Marine Mammal Research permit to CSB (no number) and permit 84845-MAR to E.L.C. and University of Auckland Animal Ethics Committee (AEC) approved protocols AEC/02/2005/R334 to C.S.B. and 002072 to E.L.C. Argentina samples were collected under permits from Dirección de Fauna y Flora Silvestres and Subsecretaría de Conservación y Areas Protegidas from Chubut for Argentina and the University of Utah Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee (IACUC) under assigned protocol number 05-01003 and in Brazil under permit Sisbio 16769 from the Brazilian Ministry of the Environment. Sample collection and analysis were funded by the Charles University Grant Agency (1140217), Dyer Island Conservation Trust, Great White House, Kleinbaai, ExxonMobil, Total, and Eni in South Africa; the Department of Environment, Land, Water, and Planning, Victoria; Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Tasmania; and the Australian Marine Mammal Centre (AMMC), Australia. Sample collection in New Zealand was funded by the following: 1995 to 1998 Auckland Islands field seasons—the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society, the US Department of State (Program for Cooperative US/NZ Antarctic Research), the Auckland University Research Council, and the NZ Marsden Fund; 2006 to 2009 Auckland Islands field seasons—Winifred Violet Scott Estate Research Grant Fund, Australian Antarctic Division, Marine Conservation Action Fund, Blue Planet Marine NZ Ltd., Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment, New Publisher Copyright: © 2023 the Author(s).
PY - 2023/3/7
Y1 - 2023/3/7
N2 - Assessing environmental changes in Southern Ocean ecosystems is difficult due to its remoteness and data sparsity. Monitoring marine predators that respond rapidly to environmental variation may enable us to track anthropogenic effects on ecosystems. Yet, many long-term datasets of marine predators are incomplete because they are spatially constrained and/or track ecosystems already modified by industrial fishing and whaling in the latter half of the 20th century. Here, we assess the contemporary offshore distribution of a wide-ranging marine predator, the southern right whale (SRW, Eubalaena australis), that forages on copepods and krill from ~30°S to the Antarctic ice edge (>60°S). We analyzed carbon and nitrogen isotope values of 1,002 skin samples from six genetically distinct SRW populations using a customized assignment approach that accounts for temporal and spatial variation in the Southern Ocean phytoplankton isoscape. Over the past three decades, SRWs increased their use of mid-latitude foraging grounds in the south Atlantic and southwest (SW) Indian oceans in the late austral summer and autumn and slightly increased their use of high-latitude (>60°S) foraging grounds in the SW Pacific, coincident with observed changes in prey distribution and abundance on a circumpolar scale. Comparing foraging assignments with whaling records since the 18th century showed remarkable stability in use of mid-latitude foraging areas. We attribute this consistency across four centuries to the physical stability of ocean fronts and resulting productivity in mid-latitude ecosystems of the Southern Ocean compared with polar regions that may be more influenced by recent climate change.
AB - Assessing environmental changes in Southern Ocean ecosystems is difficult due to its remoteness and data sparsity. Monitoring marine predators that respond rapidly to environmental variation may enable us to track anthropogenic effects on ecosystems. Yet, many long-term datasets of marine predators are incomplete because they are spatially constrained and/or track ecosystems already modified by industrial fishing and whaling in the latter half of the 20th century. Here, we assess the contemporary offshore distribution of a wide-ranging marine predator, the southern right whale (SRW, Eubalaena australis), that forages on copepods and krill from ~30°S to the Antarctic ice edge (>60°S). We analyzed carbon and nitrogen isotope values of 1,002 skin samples from six genetically distinct SRW populations using a customized assignment approach that accounts for temporal and spatial variation in the Southern Ocean phytoplankton isoscape. Over the past three decades, SRWs increased their use of mid-latitude foraging grounds in the south Atlantic and southwest (SW) Indian oceans in the late austral summer and autumn and slightly increased their use of high-latitude (>60°S) foraging grounds in the SW Pacific, coincident with observed changes in prey distribution and abundance on a circumpolar scale. Comparing foraging assignments with whaling records since the 18th century showed remarkable stability in use of mid-latitude foraging areas. We attribute this consistency across four centuries to the physical stability of ocean fronts and resulting productivity in mid-latitude ecosystems of the Southern Ocean compared with polar regions that may be more influenced by recent climate change.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148970126&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.2214035120
DO - 10.1073/pnas.2214035120
M3 - Article
C2 - 36848574
AN - SCOPUS:85148970126
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 120
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IS - 10
M1 - e2214035120
ER -