Loss Modification Incentives for Insurers Under Expected Utility and Loss Aversion

Adriaan R. Soetevent*, Liting Zhou

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
254 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We investigate whether a profit-maximizing insurer with the opportunity to modify the loss probability will engage in loss prevention or instead spend effort to increase the loss probability. First we study this question within a traditional expected utility framework; then we apply Koszegi and Rabin's (2006, 2007) loss aversion model to account for reference-dependence in consumer preferences. Largely independent of the adopted framework, we find that the profit-maximizing loss probability for many commonly used parameterizations is close to 1/2. So in cases where the initial loss probability is low, insurers will have an incentive to increase it. This qualifies appeals to grant insurers market power to incentivize them to engage in loss prevention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-67
Number of pages27
JournalEconomist-Netherlands
Volume164
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar-2016

Keywords

  • Expected utility
  • Reference-dependent preferences
  • Risk
  • Insurance market
  • RISK-AVERSION
  • PROSPECT-THEORY
  • SELF-INSURANCE
  • MARKET
  • PREFERENCES
  • ECONOMICS
  • DECISION
  • THEOREM

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Loss Modification Incentives for Insurers Under Expected Utility and Loss Aversion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this