Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Lost in Translation: Is Data Protection Labour Law Protection?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

45 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article critically examines how the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) defines and applies the legal categories of “data subject” and “data controller” within employment relationships. Under the GDPR, employers who collect and process personal data are classified as data controllers, while employees are designated as data subjects. However, this article argues that such a “translation” of data protection categories, rights, and obligations into the regulation of workplace dynamics requires closer examination. The focus is on evaluating whether the GDPR’s rights and obligations for data subjects and data controllers accurately capture the agency and interests of employee and employer roles in the workplace. Through an analysis of data subject rights (GDPR, Articles 12–22) and selected data controller obligations (GDPR, Articles 24, 25, and 35), this article identifies a “Lost in Translation” effect, where the GDPR’s assumptions of autonomy and agency conflict with the hierarchical nature of employment relationships and with the information asymmetries between employers and data processors (GDPR, Article 28). Ultimately, this analysis highlights the need to reconsider and adapt these legal categories to better reflect the unique characteristics of employment in the regulation of data processing.
Original languageEnglish
Article number6
Pages (from-to)553-583
Number of pages31
JournalComparative Labor Law & Policy Journal
Volume45
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28-Nov-2025

Keywords

  • Labour Law Protection
  • Data Protection
  • Privacy
  • GDPR
  • Data Subject
  • Data Controller
  • Employee
  • Employer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lost in Translation: Is Data Protection Labour Law Protection?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this