TY - CHAP
T1 - Luther in Dutch Reformed Orthodoxy
T2 - A Bag of Worms against the Lutherans
AU - van den Belt, Hendrik
PY - 2017/5/15
Y1 - 2017/5/15
N2 - Although there is little explicit reference to Martin Luther’s theology in Dutch Reformed sources, still Luther serves as an ally against Lutheran orthodoxy. Confronted with the wish of Lutherans in the Dutch Republic to organize separate Lutheran congregations, some Reformed authors like Caspar Grevinchoven (1550–1606) and Henricus Alutarius (1592–1633) suggested that the Lutherans – whom they called neo-Lutherans – could join the Reformed churches, because there was no essential difference between Luther and them. Some later theologians, such as Johannes de Mey (1617–1678), were less polemical, advocating a unification of churches from both confessions on the basis of the fundamental doctrines they held in common. Remarkably, the (Altered) Augsburg Confession was seen as a pan-protestant confessional statement by the Reformed. In its conclusions this paper suggests that Luther was not often explicitly referred to, because Reformed theologians did not understand theology in historical or contextual terms but as reflection of eternal truths revealed in Scripture and found continuity with the Church Fathers more important than explicit references to the Reformers, because of their view of the catholicity of the Reformed church.
AB - Although there is little explicit reference to Martin Luther’s theology in Dutch Reformed sources, still Luther serves as an ally against Lutheran orthodoxy. Confronted with the wish of Lutherans in the Dutch Republic to organize separate Lutheran congregations, some Reformed authors like Caspar Grevinchoven (1550–1606) and Henricus Alutarius (1592–1633) suggested that the Lutherans – whom they called neo-Lutherans – could join the Reformed churches, because there was no essential difference between Luther and them. Some later theologians, such as Johannes de Mey (1617–1678), were less polemical, advocating a unification of churches from both confessions on the basis of the fundamental doctrines they held in common. Remarkably, the (Altered) Augsburg Confession was seen as a pan-protestant confessional statement by the Reformed. In its conclusions this paper suggests that Luther was not often explicitly referred to, because Reformed theologians did not understand theology in historical or contextual terms but as reflection of eternal truths revealed in Scripture and found continuity with the Church Fathers more important than explicit references to the Reformers, because of their view of the catholicity of the Reformed church.
KW - Reformed Orthodoxy
KW - Lutheranism
KW - Caspar Grevinchoven (1550–1606)
KW - Henricus Alutarius (1592–1633)
KW - Johannes de Mey (1617–1678)
KW - Altered Augsburg Confession
M3 - Chapter
SN - 9783525552629
T3 - Refo500 Academic Series
SP - 427
EP - 442
BT - Luther and Calvinism
A2 - Selderhuis, Herman J.
A2 - Lange van Ravenswaay, J. Marius J.
PB - Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
CY - Göttingen
ER -