Machine learning in anesthesiology: Detecting adverse events in clinical practice

Tomasz T. Maciag*, Kai van Amsterdam, Albertus Ballast, Fokie Cnossen, Michel M. R. F. Struys

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
145 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The credibility of threshold-based alarms in anesthesia monitors is low and most of the warnings they produce are not informative. This study aims to show that Machine Learning techniques have a potential to generate meaningful alarms during general anesthesia without putting constraints on the type of procedure. Two distinct approaches were tested - Complication Detection and Anomaly Detection. The former is a generic supervised learning problem and for this a simple feed-forward Neural Network performed best. For the latter, we used an Encoder-Decoder Long Short-Term Memory architecture that does not require a large manually-labeled dataset. We show this approach to be more flexible and in the spirit of Explainable Artificial Intelligence, offering greater potential for future improvement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalHealth Informatics Journal
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul-2022

Keywords

  • anesthesiology
  • monitoring
  • machine learning
  • decision support system

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Machine learning in anesthesiology: Detecting adverse events in clinical practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this