Measuring self-regulation in a learning context: Reliability and validity of the Self-Regulation of Learning Self-Report Scale (SRL-SRS)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

94 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Self-regulation of learning has been suggested to refer to self-directed processes that help individuals learn more effectively. No instrument is available to date examining selfregulation of learning as a relatively stable individual attribute. Therefore, based on Zimmerman’s self-regulated learning theory, we composed the Self-Regulation of Learning Self-Report Scale (SRL-SRS), which comprises six subscales: planning, self-monitoring, evaluation, reflection, effort and self-efficacy. This study examined the reliability and validity of the SRL-SRS. Two confirmatory factor analyses were conducted involving 601 and 600 adolescents aged 11 to 17 years (Mage ¼ 13.9, SD ¼ 1.3). The first confirmatory
factor analysis revealed that an adjusted six-factor model described the observed data and content of factors best, which was cross-validated in the second sample of adolescents. The relative and absolute test-retest reliability was satisfactory. In conclusion, this study showed that the SRL-SRS is a reliable instrument, and supported its content and construct validity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)24-38
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Keywords

  • self-regulation; learning; adolescent; questionnaire; confirmatory factor analysis; internal consistency; test-retest reliability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring self-regulation in a learning context: Reliability and validity of the Self-Regulation of Learning Self-Report Scale (SRL-SRS)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this