Mechanical strength of stock and custom abutments as original and aftermarket components after thermomechanical aging

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to assess the impact on the mechanical strength and failure patterns of implant-abutment complexes of choosing different abutment types, designs and manufacturers, aiding in selecting the optimal restorative solution. Stock and custom abutments from original and aftermarket suppliers were subjected to thermomechanical aging.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Stock and custom abutments from the implant manufacturer (original) and a aftermarket supplier (nonoriginal) were connected to identical implants with internal connection. Custom abutments were designed in a typical molar and premolar design, manufactured using the workflow from the respective suppliers. A total of 90 implants (4 mm diameter, 3.4 mm platform, 13 mm length) equally divided across 6 groups (three designs, two manufacturers) underwent thermo-mechanical aging according to three different regimes, simulating five (n = 30) or 10 years (n = 30) of clinical function, or unaged control (n = 30). Subsequently, all samples were tested to failure.

RESULTS: During aging, no failures occurred. The mean strength at failure was 1009N ± 171, showing significant differences between original and nonoriginal abutments overall (-230N ± 27.1, p < .001), and within each abutment type (p = .000), favoring original abutments. Aging did not significantly affect the failure load, while the type of abutment and manufacturer did, favoring original and custom-designed abutments. The most common failure was implant bending or deformation, significantly differing between original and nonoriginal abutments and screws. All failure tests resulted in clinically unsalvageable implants and abutments.

CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, original abutments exhibited a higher mechanical strength compared to the nonoriginal alternative, regardless of the amount of simulated clinical use. Similarly, custom abutments showed higher mechanical strength compared to stock abutments. However, mechanical strength in all abutments tested was higher than average chewing forces reported in literature, thus components tested in this study can be expected to perform equally well in clinical situations without excessive force.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere892
Number of pages12
JournalClinical and experimental dental research
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug-2024

Keywords

  • Dental Abutments
  • Dental Implant-Abutment Design
  • Dental Stress Analysis
  • Dental Restoration Failure
  • Materials Testing
  • Humans
  • Stress, Mechanical
  • Dental Implants

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mechanical strength of stock and custom abutments as original and aftermarket components after thermomechanical aging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this