Abstract
We argue that the field has moved forward from the old debate about "analogical" versus "symbolic" processing. First, it is questionable that there is a strong a priori argument for assuming a common processing mode. Second, we explore the possibility that imagery is not a unitary mental function. Finally, we discuss the empirical basis of the involvement of primary areas.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 188-189 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr-2002 |
Externally published | Yes |