Meta-perception and misinformation

Sean Bogart, Jeffrey Lees

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research on political misperceptions is flourishing across disciplines. Literature on misinformation susceptibility and political group meta-perceptions have arisen independently, both seeking to understand how inaccurate social beliefs of the first and second order respectively contribute to political polarization. Here we review these literatures and argue for greater integration. We highlight four domains where these two literatures intersect: how inaccurate group meta-perceptions may increase misinformation susceptibility, how misinformation may itself convey inaccurate second-order information, how second-order perceptions of misinformation belief may increase misinformation susceptibility, and how reputational concerns may affect misinformation engagement. Our hope is to illuminate fruitful avenues of future research and inspire scholars of political misperceptions to pursue unified theoretical models of how misperceptions drive negative political outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101717
JournalCurrent Opinion in Psychology
Volume54
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec-2023
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Meta-perception and misinformation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this