Methodological practices for enacting "strong" sociomateriality in qualitative IS research

Marko Niemimaa*, Ulrike Schultze, Gijs van den Heuvel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

By redefining the relationship between the social and the technological in Information Systems research, the ontological stance referred to as “sociomateriality” has received considerable attention as well as critique, especially with regard to its application in empirical investigations. In this chapter, we explore how researchers can enact fully-relational or “strong” sociomateriality in qualitative empirical research. We develop and illustrate methodological practices to enact this form of sociomateriality in field studies. These practices are derived from Agential Realism, a philosophical position that is most frequently applied in IS research that adopts a fully relational ontology. The practices support authors in their efforts to conceptualize their phenomena of interest in relational terms, that is, as flows and forms of becoming. Further, drawing on published studies of IS phenomena in which Barad’s concepts have been applied, this chapter provides IS researchers with insights into how “strong” sociomaterial theorizing may be accomplished.


Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Information Systems
Subtitle of host publicationNew Perspectives
EditorsRobert M. Davison
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Chapter11
Pages182-196
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9781802205398
ISBN (Print)9781802205381
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21-Jul-2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Methodological practices for enacting "strong" sociomateriality in qualitative IS research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this