Mitigation and Compensation Measures under the EU Habitats Directive in Selected Member States

Lorenzo Squintani*, Jacqueline Zijlmans

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article aims at establishing how national courts interpret the concepts of mitigation and compensation measures under Article 6 of the Habitats Directive. Based on a comparative method of legal research, we focus on the implementation of Articles 6(3) and 6(4) of the Habitats Directive, as interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Sweetman, Briels and Orleans cases, and its application in the courts of six Member States, i.e. France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, Italy and Bulgaria. Our study highlights national courts tendency to interpret the Habitats Directive and related national law so as to cover matters which have not explicitly been dealt with by the CJEU without asking for preliminary rulings. In each legal order, this lack of preliminary references comported a wrongful interpretation of Article 6(3) of the Directive. This finding shows that the lack of preliminary references affected the legal effectiveness of Article 6 HD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2-16
Number of pages15
JournalEuropean Energy and Environmental Law Review
Volume28
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Feb-2019

Cite this