Moral hazard and selection for voluntary deductibles

Rob J. M. Alessie, Viola Angelini, Jochen O. Mierau, Laura Viluma*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)
420 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper investigates whether the voluntary deductible in the Dutch health insurance system reduces moral hazard or acts only as a cost reduction tool for low-risk individuals. We use a sample of 14,089 observations, comprising 2,939 individuals over seven waves from the Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social sciences panel for the analysis. We employ bivariate models that jointly model the choice of a deductible and health care utilization and supplement the identification with an instrumental variable strategy. The results show that the voluntary deductible reduces moral hazard, especially in the decision to visit a doctor (extensive margin) compared with the number of visits (intensive margin). In addition, a robustness test shows that selection on moral hazard is not present in this context.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1251-1269
Number of pages19
JournalHealth Economics
Volume29
Issue number10
Early online date31-Jul-2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct-2020

Keywords

  • deductible
  • health insurance
  • moral hazard
  • selection
  • PRIVATE HEALTH-INSURANCE
  • INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES
  • RISK EQUALIZATION
  • CARE INSURANCE
  • SELF-SELECTION
  • DEMAND
  • SERVICES
  • HETEROGENEITY
  • INFORMATION
  • ECONOMICS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Moral hazard and selection for voluntary deductibles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this