Motivated inaction: when collective disadvantage does not induce collective action

Katherine Stroebe*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Why do people often fail to act out against their disadvantage? One explanation has been in terms of just-world beliefs, which cloud perceptions of injustice. An additional route to inaction is proposed here: Just-world believers refrain from acting because they do not see the necessity, as they expect in a just world all will turn out well in the long run (i.e., all-will-be-well motivation). This hypothesis was tested in a situation of collective injustice typically studied by collective action researchers; namely, demonstration attendance/collective action intentions of students confronted with government cuts. Results revealed high just-world believers were less likely to engage in collective action. Importantly, effects were mediated by all-will-be-well motivation. Implications for studying determinants of inaction are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1997-2006
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of applied social psychology
Volume43
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct-2013

Keywords

  • JUST-WORLD BELIEFS
  • SYSTEM-JUSTIFICATION
  • DISCRIMINATION
  • MODEL
  • MERITOCRACY
  • INEQUALITY
  • RELEVANCE
  • IDEOLOGY
  • LOOKING
  • FUTURE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Motivated inaction: when collective disadvantage does not induce collective action'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this