Movement variation in infants born following IVF/ICSI with and without ovarian hyperstimulation

Pamela Schendelaar, Maas Jan Heineman, Marjolein Jongbloed-Pereboom, Sacha La Bastide-Van Gemert, Karin J. Middelburg, Edwin R. Van den Heuvel, Mijna Hadders-Algra*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The effect of in vitro fertilisation (LW) on neurodevelopment is not fully understood. Probably, IVF does not affect traditional measures of neurodevelopment in infancy. Recently, an instrument the Infant Motor Profile (IMP), was developed that evaluates the quality of motor behaviour. It includes the evaluation of movement variation (i.e. movement repertoire size), a parameter reflecting the integrity of cortical connectivity.

Aim: To evaluate the effect of ovarian hyperstimulation and the in vitro procedure on movement variation during infancy.

Study design: Prospective cohort study.

Subjects: Singletons born following IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with conventional controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH-NF/ICSI, n = 68), in a modified natural cycle (MNC-IVF/ICSI, n = 57) and natural conception born to subfertile couples (Sub-NC, n = 90).

Outcome measures: Children were assessed with the IMP at 4, 10 and 18 months, resulting in a total IMP score and five domain scores: variation, variability, symmetry, fluency and performance. Primary outcome was the domain score variation.

Results: A significant effect of study group was observed for the variation score up until 18 months of age (p = 0.039). COH-IVF/ICSI children had a significantly lower mean variation score than MNC-IVF/ICSI children (mean difference [95% confidence interval] -1.010 [-1.766; -0.254]). Mean variation scores of COH-IVF/ICSI and Sub-NC children were similar; the same held true for the comparison between MNC-IVF/ICSI and Sub-NC. Total IMP scores and other domain scores of the three groups were similar.

Conclusion: The present study did not demonstrate a clear effect of ovarian hyperstimulation and the in vitro procedure on movement variation throughout infancy. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)507-513
Number of pages7
JournalEarly Human Development
Volume89
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul-2013

Keywords

  • In vitro fertilisation
  • Ovarian hyperstimulation
  • Neurodevelopmental outcome
  • Variation
  • Follow-up
  • IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION
  • CUMULATIVE PREGNANCY RATES
  • NATIONAL BIRTH COHORT
  • GRONINGEN ART COHORT
  • NATURAL CYCLE IVF
  • PRETERM INFANTS
  • CHILDREN BORN
  • MOTOR PROFILE
  • INFERTILITY TREATMENT
  • GENERAL MOVEMENTS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Movement variation in infants born following IVF/ICSI with and without ovarian hyperstimulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this