TY - JOUR
T1 - Multicenter Evaluation of the Idylla GeneFusion in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
AU - Depoilly, Thomas
AU - Garinet, Simon
AU - van Kempen, Léon C
AU - Schuuring, Ed
AU - Clavé, Sergi
AU - Bellosillo, Beatriz
AU - Ercolani, Cristiana
AU - Buglioni, Simonetta
AU - Siemanowski, Janna
AU - Merkelbach-Bruse, Sabine
AU - Tischler, Verena
AU - Demes, Melanie-Christin
AU - Paridaens, Henry
AU - Sibille, Catherine
AU - de Montpreville, Vincent Thomas
AU - Rouleau, Etienne
AU - Bartczak, Artur
AU - Pasieka-Lis, Monika
AU - Wei Teo, Ryan Yee
AU - Chuah, Khoon Leong
AU - Barbosa, Marta
AU - Quintana, Carlos
AU - Biscuola, Michele
AU - Delgado-Garcia, Mercedes
AU - Vacirca, Davide
AU - Rappa, Alessandra
AU - Cashmore, Matthew
AU - Smith, Matthew
AU - Jasionowicz, Piotr
AU - Meeney, Adam
AU - Desmeules, Patrice
AU - Terris, Benoit
AU - Mansuet-Lupo, Audrey
N1 - Copyright © 2022 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Targeted therapy in lung cancer requires the assessment of multiple oncogenic driver alterations, including fusion genes. This retrospective study evaluated the Idylla GeneFusion prototype, an automated and ease-of-use (<2 minutes) test, with a short turnaround time (3 hours) to detect fusions involving ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK1/2/3 genes and MET exon 14 skipping. This multicenter study (18 centers) included 313 tissue samples from lung cancer patients with 97 ALK, 44 ROS1, 20 RET, and 5 NTRKs fusions, 32 MET exon 14 skipping, and 115 wild-type samples, previously identified with reference methods (RNA-based next generation sequencing/fluorescence in situ hybridization/quantitative PCR). Valid results were obtained for 306 cases (98%), overall concordance between Idylla and the reference methods was 89% (273/306); overall sensitivity and specificity were 85% (165/193) and 96% (108/113), respectively. Discordances were observed in 28 samples, where Idylla did not detect the alteration identified by the reference methods; and 5 samples where Idylla identified an alteration not detected by the reference methods. All of the ALK-, ROS1-, and RET-specific fusions and MET exon 14 skipping identified by Idylla GeneFusion were confirmed by reference method. To conclude, Idylla GeneFusion is a clinically valuable test that does not require a specific infrastructure, allowing a rapid result. The absence of alteration or the detection of expression imbalance only requires additional testing by orthogonal methods.
AB - Targeted therapy in lung cancer requires the assessment of multiple oncogenic driver alterations, including fusion genes. This retrospective study evaluated the Idylla GeneFusion prototype, an automated and ease-of-use (<2 minutes) test, with a short turnaround time (3 hours) to detect fusions involving ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK1/2/3 genes and MET exon 14 skipping. This multicenter study (18 centers) included 313 tissue samples from lung cancer patients with 97 ALK, 44 ROS1, 20 RET, and 5 NTRKs fusions, 32 MET exon 14 skipping, and 115 wild-type samples, previously identified with reference methods (RNA-based next generation sequencing/fluorescence in situ hybridization/quantitative PCR). Valid results were obtained for 306 cases (98%), overall concordance between Idylla and the reference methods was 89% (273/306); overall sensitivity and specificity were 85% (165/193) and 96% (108/113), respectively. Discordances were observed in 28 samples, where Idylla did not detect the alteration identified by the reference methods; and 5 samples where Idylla identified an alteration not detected by the reference methods. All of the ALK-, ROS1-, and RET-specific fusions and MET exon 14 skipping identified by Idylla GeneFusion were confirmed by reference method. To conclude, Idylla GeneFusion is a clinically valuable test that does not require a specific infrastructure, allowing a rapid result. The absence of alteration or the detection of expression imbalance only requires additional testing by orthogonal methods.
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2022.05.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2022.05.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 35718095
SN - 1525-1578
VL - 24
SP - 1021
EP - 1030
JO - Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
JF - Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
IS - 9
ER -