Nationwide evaluation of mutation-tailored anti-EGFR therapy selection in patients with colorectal cancer in daily clinical practice

PATH Consortium Members, Elisabeth M P Steeghs, Geraldine R Vink, Marloes A G Elferink, Quirinus J M Voorham, Hans Gelderblom, Iris D Nagtegaal, Katrien Grünberg, Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg*, Ed Schuuring

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    20 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    For a nationwide real-word data study on the application of predictive mutation testing of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy stratification, pathology data were collected from the Dutch Pathology Registry from October 2017 until June 2019 (N=4060) and linked with the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Mutation testing rates increased from 24% at diagnosis of stage IV disease to 60% after 20-23 months of follow-up (p<0.001). Application of anti-EGFR therapy in KRAS/NRAS wild-type patients was mainly observed from the third treatment line onwards (65% vs 17% in first/second treatment line (p<0.001)). The national average KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation rate was 63.9%, being similar for next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based approaches and single gene tests (64.4% vs 61.2%, p=ns). NGS-based approaches detected more additional potential biomarkers, for example, ERBB2 amplifications (p<0.05). Therefore, single gene tests are suitable to stratify patients with mCRC for anti-EGFR therapy, but NGS is superior enabling upfront identification of therapy resistance or facilitate enrolment into clinical trials.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)706-711
    Number of pages6
    JournalJournal of Clinical Pathology
    Volume75
    Early online date21-Oct-2021
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 4-Oct-2022

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Nationwide evaluation of mutation-tailored anti-EGFR therapy selection in patients with colorectal cancer in daily clinical practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this