Nomogram use for the prediction of indolent prostate cancer: impact on screen-detected populations

Stijn Roemeling, Monique J Roobol, Michael W Kattan, Theo H van der Kwast, Ewout W Steyerberg, Fritz H Schröder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Screening for prostate cancer has resulted in an increased incidence-to-mortality ratio. Not all cancers deserve immediate treatment. It has therefore become more important to be able to identify those cases of screen-detected prostate cancer most likely to show indolent behavior.

METHODS: The Kattan-nomogram for the prediction of indolent prostate cancer was validated and recalibrated for use in a screening setting. The recalibrated nomogram was used to calculate the number of men who were predicted to have indolent cancer in a screen-detected cohort from the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), section Rotterdam.

RESULTS: Of 1629 cancers detected in 2 subsequent screening rounds 825 were suitable for nomogram use. The remainder were very unlikely to have indolent cancer. A total of 485 men (485 of 825 = 59%) were predicted to have indolent cancer, which is 30% (485 of 1629) of all screen-detected cases. Cancers found at repeated screening after 4 years had a higher probability of indolent cancer than cases from the prevalence screening (44% vs 23%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS: The current nomogram can identify substantial groups of screen-detected cancers that are likely indolent and can therefore be considered for active surveillance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2218-21
Number of pages4
JournalCancer
Volume110
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15-Nov-2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Biopsy
  • Cohort Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood
  • Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nomogram use for the prediction of indolent prostate cancer: impact on screen-detected populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this