Non-stereotype-based threat in gender-imbalanced work groups: Mismatched self-construal erodes self-esteem and promotes performance-avoidance goals

Heike Heidemeier*, Sabine Otten, Anja S. Goeritz

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
264 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The present studies investigated whether the gender composition of a group represents a sufficient situational cue for creating a mismatch between situationally accessible and ideal self-views. A longitudinal study of 333 employees revealed that being in the numerical minority implied a mismatch with ideal self-views among those who de-emphasized independence in their chronic self-construal, whereas being in the numerical majority constituted a mismatch with ideal self-views among those who emphasized independence. Both types of employees suffered a drop in self-esteem and adopted maladaptive motivational states, namely performance-avoidance goals. The observed deleterious effect of mismatched self-construal on goal pursuit was fully mediated by a perceived lack of acceptance (low social self-esteem). We replicated these findings in a laboratory study with 268 unacquainted individuals who collaborated in small groups on a non-gender-typed group task.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)836-859
Number of pages24
JournalGroup Processes & Intergroup Relations
Volume24
Issue number5
Early online date14-May-2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1-Aug-2021

Keywords

  • achievement goals
  • gender dissimilarity
  • person-environment fit
  • self-construal
  • self-esteem
  • ACHIEVEMENT GOALS
  • SOCIAL IDENTITY
  • SOLO STATUS
  • MOTIVATIONAL CLIMATE
  • DIVERSITY
  • ATTACHMENT
  • SOCIOMETER
  • BEHAVIOR
  • DISTINCTIVENESS
  • ORGANIZATIONS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Non-stereotype-based threat in gender-imbalanced work groups: Mismatched self-construal erodes self-esteem and promotes performance-avoidance goals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this