Abstract
The present studies investigated whether the gender composition of a group represents a sufficient situational cue for creating a mismatch between situationally accessible and ideal self-views. A longitudinal study of 333 employees revealed that being in the numerical minority implied a mismatch with ideal self-views among those who de-emphasized independence in their chronic self-construal, whereas being in the numerical majority constituted a mismatch with ideal self-views among those who emphasized independence. Both types of employees suffered a drop in self-esteem and adopted maladaptive motivational states, namely performance-avoidance goals. The observed deleterious effect of mismatched self-construal on goal pursuit was fully mediated by a perceived lack of acceptance (low social self-esteem). We replicated these findings in a laboratory study with 268 unacquainted individuals who collaborated in small groups on a non-gender-typed group task.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 836-859 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Group Processes & Intergroup Relations |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 14-May-2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1-Aug-2021 |
Keywords
- achievement goals
- gender dissimilarity
- person-environment fit
- self-construal
- self-esteem
- ACHIEVEMENT GOALS
- SOCIAL IDENTITY
- SOLO STATUS
- MOTIVATIONAL CLIMATE
- DIVERSITY
- ATTACHMENT
- SOCIOMETER
- BEHAVIOR
- DISTINCTIVENESS
- ORGANIZATIONS