Occult Spheres, Planes, and Dimensions: Geometric Terminology and Analogy in Modern Esoteric Discourse

Christopher A. Plaisance*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    282 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This is an article on the history of religion and mathematics, which explores the origins and uses of geometric terminology in late-nineteenth-and early-twentieth-century esoteric discourses, and inquires as to whether or not such adaptions are instances of the discursive strategy identified by Olav Hammer as terminological scientism. For the situation regarding spheric terminology, I argue that the context is not scientistic, being rather an example of the decontextualised modern appropriation of antique terminologies. In the case of planar terminology, I conclude that while its origin with Emanuel Swedenborg as an adaption of anatomical vocabulary does indeed fit Hammer's definition of scientism, modern usage stripped the term of Swedenborg's scientistic rationale - making the scientistic designation something of a vestigial atavism. In dealing with dimensional terminology, my conclusion is that from Johann Zollner's initial formulation to the broader Spiritualistic and Theosophical applications, it exemplifies terminological scientism through and through.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)385-404
    Number of pages20
    JournalJournal of Religious History
    Volume40
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept-2016

    Keywords

    • SOUL

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Occult Spheres, Planes, and Dimensions: Geometric Terminology and Analogy in Modern Esoteric Discourse'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this