On Pros and Cons and Bills and Gates: The Heist Film as Pleasure

Julian Hanich*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)
    364 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This article tries to shed light on the multiple, but underrated pleasures of the heist film-a genre that has attracted numerous major directors from Jean-Pierre Melville and Stanley Kubrick to Michael Mann and Steven Soderbergh, but has received limited scholarly attention. I approach the genre from a, broadly, philosophical perspective and draw on thinkers such as Peter Sloterdijk, Georg Simmel, Paul Souriau and Bruno Latour to argue that their emphasis on (1) skillful action and kinaesthetic empathy, (2) smooth transgression of boundaries and (3) well-functioning social collaboration and we-connection, the genre's best exemplars satisfy, in fictional and quasi-utopian form, a number of real-life desires.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)304-320
    Number of pages17
    JournalFilm-Philosophy
    Volume24
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 12-Nov-2020

    Keywords

    • genre studies
    • heist film
    • caper movie
    • film-philosophy
    • skillful action
    • social collaboration
    • pleasure

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'On Pros and Cons and Bills and Gates: The Heist Film as Pleasure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this