On the clinical validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory and the Burnout Measure

WB Schaufeli*, A B Bakker, K Hoogduin, C Schaap, A Kladler

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    557 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Current knowledge about burnout suffers from a healthy worker bias since only working - and thus relatively healthy - employees have been investigated. The main objective of this study is to examine - for the first time among employees who sought psychological treatment - the validity of the two most widely used burnout instruments; the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and the Burnout Measure (BM). Two groups were distinguished: a "burned out" group (n = 71) that suffers from work-related neurasthenia (according to ICD-10 criteria), and a "non-burned out" group (n = 68). Results show that: (1) the validity of the three-factor structure of the MBI and the BM is confirmed; (2) burnout can partly be differentiated from other mental syndromes (e.g., anxiety and depression); and (3) two MBI-scales (Emotional Exhaustion and Depersonalization) and one BM-scale (Exhaustion) are able to discriminate between burned out and non-burned out employees. The practical implications of these results are discussed.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)565-582
    Number of pages18
    JournalPsychology & Health
    Volume16
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2001

    Keywords

    • FACTORIAL VALIDITY
    • CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY
    • EQUITY THEORY
    • 3 DIMENSIONS
    • DEPRESSION
    • TEACHERS
    • FIT
    • INVARIANCE
    • GOODNESS
    • NURSES

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'On the clinical validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory and the Burnout Measure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this