Opposition to vaccines in chile: analysis of a recent case

Juan Alberto Salmeron Henriquez*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
34 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Supreme Court of Chile ordered the vaccination of a minor whose parents had opposed his inoculation. Although the Court reached the correct result, it did so in a rather deficient way, failing to adequately explain the reasons why mandatory vaccination is appropriate. The Court should have based its decision on the balancing-test of private autonomy and public health, opting to protect the latter, and expressly rejecting the wrong arguments put forward by the anti-vaccine movement.

Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)563-573
Number of pages11
JournalRevista chilena de derecho
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Vaccines
  • Freedom of Conscience
  • Public Health
  • CIVIL-LIBERTIES
  • PUBLIC-HEALTH
  • VACCINATION
  • TUBERCULOSIS
  • THIMEROSAL
  • MOVEMENTS
  • THREAT

Cite this