Optimizing CRT Lead Placement Accuracy With CMR-Guided On-Screen Targeting: A Randomized Controlled Trial (ADVISE-CRT III)

Willem Gerrits*, Philippe C Wouters, Cheyenne S L Chiu, Marco Guglielmo, Maarten J Cramer, Pim van der Harst, Kevin Vernooy, Antonius M W van Stipdonk, Vokko P van Halm, Vincent F van Dijk, Abdul Ghani, Alexander H Maass, Sing-Cien Yap, Frebus J van Slochteren, Mathias Meine

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)
    2 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: To improve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) an on-screen image-guidance platform, CARTBox-Suite (CART-Tech B.V.), was developed to identify left ventricular pacing electrode (LVPE) implantation sites and facilitate precise LVPE placement. This multicenter randomized trial evaluated the efficacy of image guidance on LVPE implantation accuracy and its impact on left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) reduction 6 months after CRT.

    OBJECTIVES: The aim of this trial is to improve the accuracy and efficacy of LVPE placement in CRT.

    METHODS: A total of 131 heart failure patients (80% with Class I CRT indication) were enrolled across 7 hospitals in the Netherlands. CARTBox-Suite, which utilizes a cloud-based AI algorithm, was used to identify a target area with late mechanical activation based on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Scarred areas marked by late gadolinium enhancement were excluded. Patients were randomized to image-guided implantation, with on-screen guidance during the procedure or conventional implantation.

    RESULTS: The primary endpoint, LVPE implantation in the target area, was achieved significantly more often in the image-guided group (66.7% vs 29.2%; P < 0.001). The secondary endpoint was fewer LVPE placed in scarred areas in the image-guided group (7.1% vs 36.4%; P = 0.006). Mean LVESV reduction was greater in the image-guided group (43.2% vs. 37.6%), although not significantly (P = 0.166). Patients with myocardial scar showed greater LVESV reduction with image guidance (40.7% vs 27.7%; P = 0.028).

    CONCLUSIONS: Image-guided implantation resulted in significantly more LVPE placed in the target area and greater LVESV reduction in patients with myocardial scar.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
    DOIs
    Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3-Mar-2025

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Optimizing CRT Lead Placement Accuracy With CMR-Guided On-Screen Targeting: A Randomized Controlled Trial (ADVISE-CRT III)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this