Paradoxical gender effects in meat consumption across cultures

Christopher J. Hopwood*, Jahn N. Zizer, Adam T. Nissen, Courtney Dillard, Andie M. Thompkins, Joāo Graça, Daniela Romero Waldhorn, Wiebke Bleidorn

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Men tend to eat more meat than women, but it is not clear why. We tested three hypotheses in a cross-cultural design (20,802 individuals in 23 countries across four continents): that gender differences are (a) universal, (b) related to gender roles and thus weaker in countries with higher gender equality and human development, or (c) related to opportunities to express gender roles and thus stronger in countries with higher gender equality and human development. Across all countries, men tended to consume more meat than women. However, this difference increased significantly in countries with greater human development and gender equality. The paradoxical gender gap in meat consumption aligns with previous research that suggests greater differences in behavior across genders in contexts that are more developed and gender equal. We discuss implications for theories of culture and gender as well as practical implications for global meat reduction.

Original languageEnglish
Article number13033
Number of pages8
JournalScientific Reports
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec-2024

Keywords

  • Culture
  • Equality
  • Gender
  • Meat consumption
  • Paradoxical gender effect

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Paradoxical gender effects in meat consumption across cultures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this