Parameterizing, evaluating and comparing metapopulation models with data from individual-based simulations

Frank M. Hilker*, Martin Hinsch, Hans Joachim Poethke

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Due to the lack of sufficient data and appropriate ecological information parameterizing predictive population dynamical models usually is a difficult task. The approach proposed in this study is meant to overcome this problem by using detailed individual-based simulations to generate artificial data. With short-term data samples, the models to be investigated can be parameterized and their predictions be compared. The flexibility of individual-based simulations as experimental tools also facilitates the evaluation and comparison of different (aggregated) model types. The presented approach is a step towards unifying models of different complexity. As an example we applied it to two metapopulation models of insect species in a highly fragmented landscape: the well-known incidence function model with a patch-based representation of space and a grid-based analogue. The models are tested with respect to their data requirement and recommendations for a better data sampling are derived. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)476-485
Number of pages10
JournalEcological Modelling
Volume199
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16-Dec-2006
EventInternational Conference of the International-Environmental-Modelling-and-Software-Society - , Germany
Duration: 14-Jun-200417-Jun-2004

Keywords

  • model comparison
  • parameterization
  • metapopulation
  • individual-based model
  • incidence function model
  • grid-based
  • POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS
  • PATCH OCCUPANCY MODELS
  • ECOLOGICAL THEORY
  • DYNAMICS
  • EXTINCTION
  • LANDSCAPES
  • DISPERSAL
  • PATTERN
  • HETEROGENEITY
  • OPTIMIZATION

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Parameterizing, evaluating and comparing metapopulation models with data from individual-based simulations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this