TY - JOUR
T1 - Parent-reported phenotype data on chromosome 6 aberrations collected via an online questionnaire
T2 - data consistency and data availability
AU - Engwerda, Aafke
AU - Frentz, Barbara
AU - Rraku, Eleana
AU - de Souza, Nadia F. Simoes
AU - Swertz, Morris A.
AU - Plantinga, Mirjam
AU - Kerstjens-Frederikse, Wilhelmina S.
AU - Ranchor, Adelita V.
AU - van Ravenswaaij-Arts, Conny M.A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by an e-health Grant from ZonMw (113312101) and by crowdfunding organized by Chromosome 6 parents. AE and ER are recipients of a Junior Scientific Masterclass MD/PhD scholarship of the University Medical Center Groningen.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/3/19
Y1 - 2023/3/19
N2 - Background: Even with the introduction of new genetic techniques that enable accurate genomic characterization, knowledge about the phenotypic spectrum of rare chromosomal disorders is still limited, both in literature and existing databases. Yet this clinical information is of utmost importance for health professionals and the parents of children with rare diseases. Since existing databases are often hampered by the limited time and willingness of health professionals to input new data, we collected phenotype data directly from parents of children with a chromosome 6 disorder. These parents were reached via social media, and the information was collected via the online Chromosome 6 Questionnaire, which includes 115 main questions on congenital abnormalities, medical problems, behaviour, growth and development. Methods: Here, we assess data consistency by comparing parent-reported phenotypes to phenotypes based on copies of medical files for the same individual (n = 20) and data availability by comparing the data available on specific characteristics reported by parents (n = 34) to data available in existing literature (n = 39). Results: The reported answers to the main questions on phenotype characteristics were 85–95% consistent, and the consistency of answers to subsequent more detailed questions was 77–96%. For all but two main questions, significantly more data was collected from parents via the Chromosome 6 Questionnaire than was currently available in literature. For the topics developmental delay and brain abnormalities, no significant difference in the amount of available data was found. The only feature for which significantly more data was available in literature was a sub-question on the type of brain abnormality present. Conclusion: This is the first study to compare phenotype data collected directly from parents to data extracted from medical files on the same individuals. We found that the data was highly consistent, and phenotype data collected via the online Chromosome 6 Questionnaire resulted in more available information on most clinical characteristics when compared to phenotypes reported in literature reports thus far. We encourage active patient participation in rare disease research and have shown that parent-reported phenotypes are reliable and contribute to our knowledge of the phenotypic spectrum of rare chromosomal disorders.
AB - Background: Even with the introduction of new genetic techniques that enable accurate genomic characterization, knowledge about the phenotypic spectrum of rare chromosomal disorders is still limited, both in literature and existing databases. Yet this clinical information is of utmost importance for health professionals and the parents of children with rare diseases. Since existing databases are often hampered by the limited time and willingness of health professionals to input new data, we collected phenotype data directly from parents of children with a chromosome 6 disorder. These parents were reached via social media, and the information was collected via the online Chromosome 6 Questionnaire, which includes 115 main questions on congenital abnormalities, medical problems, behaviour, growth and development. Methods: Here, we assess data consistency by comparing parent-reported phenotypes to phenotypes based on copies of medical files for the same individual (n = 20) and data availability by comparing the data available on specific characteristics reported by parents (n = 34) to data available in existing literature (n = 39). Results: The reported answers to the main questions on phenotype characteristics were 85–95% consistent, and the consistency of answers to subsequent more detailed questions was 77–96%. For all but two main questions, significantly more data was collected from parents via the Chromosome 6 Questionnaire than was currently available in literature. For the topics developmental delay and brain abnormalities, no significant difference in the amount of available data was found. The only feature for which significantly more data was available in literature was a sub-question on the type of brain abnormality present. Conclusion: This is the first study to compare phenotype data collected directly from parents to data extracted from medical files on the same individuals. We found that the data was highly consistent, and phenotype data collected via the online Chromosome 6 Questionnaire resulted in more available information on most clinical characteristics when compared to phenotypes reported in literature reports thus far. We encourage active patient participation in rare disease research and have shown that parent-reported phenotypes are reliable and contribute to our knowledge of the phenotypic spectrum of rare chromosomal disorders.
KW - Chromosome 6
KW - Digital health
KW - Parent-reported phenotype
KW - Patient participation
KW - Rare disease
KW - Self-phenotyping
KW - Social media
U2 - 10.1186/s13023-023-02657-x
DO - 10.1186/s13023-023-02657-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 36935495
AN - SCOPUS:85150531582
SN - 1750-1172
VL - 18
JO - Orphanet journal of rare diseases
JF - Orphanet journal of rare diseases
IS - 1
M1 - 60
ER -